Looking to break into venture capital?

Our next 1752vc Venture Fellow cohort begins Monday, July 27 at 5:00 PM PT, and we only have a few spots remaining.

Over eight weeks, you'll learn how to source startups, evaluate deals, conduct due diligence, understand term sheets, and build a real venture investing skill set through live, case-study discussions led by Lucas J. Pols, GP at 1752vc.

Join 375+ Venture Fellows across 18 cohorts who have used the program to gain practical VC experience and expand their network.

Only a few seats remain.

→ Apply now

Everyone's waiting for the next channel to be born.

Channels don't die in a flash. They decay. Slowly, then all at once. The cold email that booked you ten demos a day in 2023 books you one in 2026. Same script. Same stack. A tenth of the yield.

Andrew Chen named this a decade ago — the Law of Shitty Clickthroughs. Every marketing channel degrades over time. The first banner ad ever run had a 44% clickthrough rate. Today the average is 0.05%. That's not a glitch, it’s the rule.

Here's the reality: a channel works right up until everyone finds it. Then it doesn't.

A new channel is an arbitrage. You're buying attention below market because the market hasn't priced it yet.

Cold email worked because inboxes were quiet. LinkedIn outbound worked because the feed wasn't sludge. Cold calling worked because people picked up.

Then the playbook leaks. The tools commoditize. The course-sellers package it. And the spread you were harvesting collapses to zero — because that's what spreads do.

AI didn't break this cycle, but it put it on fast-forward.

What used to take five years to saturate now takes five months. One founder finds the edge, posts the case study, sells the template, and ten thousand people run it by Friday. The half-life of every channel is shrinking toward zero.

Look at the three channels that built modern B2B GTM:

Email is already underwater. AI writes a thousand "personalized" first lines an hour. Every inbox is a landfill. The spam filters got smarter, then the senders got smarter, and now it's an arms race nobody wins. Reply rates are in freefall and the floor isn't in sight.

Social is next. Auto-AI comments are already everywhere. When a bot can flood any feed with plausible engagement, the feed stops meaning anything. The signal-to-noise ratio breaks. The algorithm chokes. Organic reach — already a fraction of what it was — goes to near zero for anyone without an existing audience.

The phone will disappear. Not because the device dies — because nobody answers it anymore. When the only thing landing on your phone is a voice-agent salesperson, you stop picking up. Full stop. The cold call assumed a person on the other end who might answer. That assumption goes to zero the moment every unknown number is a bot reading a script.

They don't activate. They don't reply. They don't pick up.

Three pipes. All clogging. At the same time.

There's always a new one. SEO gave way to social. Social gave way to influencers. Influencers gave way to communities. Every cycle someone calls distribution dead, and a new pipe opens.

So where's the next edge? Here's the honest answer: it might not be a channel at all.

When email, social, and the phone all clog at once, the arbitrage doesn't necessarily move sideways to a fourth outbound pipe. It changes shape. The next edge looks less like a way to reach people and more like a way to get found.

Maybe it's inbound — being worth seeking out, so demand pulls instead of you pushing. Maybe it's discoverability through agents, when buyers stop searching and just ask an AI "what's the best tool for X" and take the three names it gives back. Maybe it's something neither of us has a word for yet.

I'm not going to tell you which one. Not because I'm coy — because if I gave you the answer, the channels working for us would be gone tomorrow.

That's the tell, by the way. Anyone handing you the channel either doesn't have one that works, or is about to burn theirs by telling the crowd.

And here's the part that matters most: if you read about a channel here, or anywhere online, it's probably already too late. The edge is gone the moment it's written up. By the time there's a playbook, a course, a thread — the spread has closed. You're not early. You're the crowd.

So the skill isn't memorizing the next channel. It's building the judgment to spot it yourself, before it has a name.

That's the actual muscle. Watch where attention is moving before it's obvious. Run the cheap experiment while everyone's still arguing about whether it works. Notice when the thing that worked last quarter quietly stopped — and ask why, instead of running it harder. The operators who win don't get handed the edge. They see it first because they've trained themselves to look.

This piece can't give you the channel. Nobody can. It can only point you at the place to go hunting.

Whatever the next edge turns out to be, the instinct for catching it is old.

Growth hacking has never been about finding the one true channel. It's about leaning into the edge — the new mechanic nobody's priced yet — and squeezing it before it decays. That's not a flaw in the strategy. That is the strategy.

LinkedIn cracked it with "upload your address book." A single growth loop that turned every new user into an invite machine, and they rode it from nothing to a network.

Facebook did the opposite — and won the same way. They restricted the audience. Harvard only, then Ivies, then colleges. Exclusivity as a growth hack. They made getting in feel like getting in.

Different mechanics. Same instinct: find the edge, lean in hard, capture the spread before the crowd shows up.

So no, the answer isn't "stop chasing edges." The hunt is the work. The best operators will always be the ones who spot the next unpriced mechanic first and move before it's a LinkedIn template.

The question is what you do with the spread once you've captured it.

Because here's the part most growth hackers skip: every edge you lean into lives on someone else's platform. LinkedIn closed the address-book loophole. Facebook throttled organic reach to near zero. The landlord always changes the locks — right after you've built your house on their land.

We don't know what the next edge is. Nobody does. That's the point of an edge.

But you can hedge. And the most secure hedge is converting whatever channel is working right now into an audience you own — off-platform, off-algorithm, off the landlord's leash.

An email list where you control delivery. A community that lives whether or not the feed cooperates. A reputation that makes someone open your message before they read the subject line.

Lean into the edge to grow. Bank the gains into something nobody can throttle.

That's the whole move. Use the channel while it's hot — then turn the hot channel into a direct line that survives it going cold. Kevin Kelly's 1,000 True Fans, captured deliberately instead of rented temporarily.

The growth hacker's edge is finding the next channel. The survivor's edge is owning the audience the channel gave you.

Keep hunting edges. That part never stops. But know the difference between a 0.3% reply rate that needs a new mechanic and a channel in structural collapse — no subject-line test fixes the latter.

The mistake isn't leaning into the channel. It's leaning in and banking nothing. Every campaign that works should be feeding an owned asset — a list, a community, a reason to be in someone's inbox by invitation instead of by interruption. Outbound is the bridge. Audience is the destination. The founders who win the next cycle are building media muscle today, off-platform, while the current channel still funds the runway.

Inbound isn't soft. It's the hard version. It's slower to start and impossible to fake, which is exactly why it's a moat. Anyone can buy a sending domain. Nobody can buy ten years of being worth listening to.

Distribution is becoming a content problem. The companies that treat media as a core function — not a marketing line item — are the ones who'll still be reachable when the pipes finish clogging.

Different lens, same logic.

When you diligence a company, stop being impressed by outbound volume. "We send 30,000 emails a month" is a depreciating asset dressed up as traction. Ask the better question: what does this company own that gets stronger when the channel gets weaker?

An audience. A brand. A community. A reputation that pulls demand instead of pushing it. That's the line item that survives the next GTM reset — and most decks don't have it.

Channels don't die. They decay — every one of them, on a clock that's only getting faster.

Keep hunting the edge. LinkedIn did it. Facebook did it. The next great company is leaning into a mechanic nobody's named yet.

Just don't rent forever. Lean into the channel to grow — then bank the gains into an audience that's yours when the landlord changes the locks.

The edge wins you the cycle.

What you own wins you the next one.