You’re interested in the 95% That Failed? Let’s Talk About the 5% That Won.

In partnership with porkbun

Level Up With a Domain Name From Porkbun

Grow your latest venture with a domain name from Porkbun. Named the #1 domain registrar 3 years in a row by USA Today, they offer hundreds of domains like .com, .tech, .shop, and others at cost — without the markup other registrars have.

Plus every domain at Porkbun comes with free WHOIS privacy, SSL certificates, Cloudflare DNS, and more. All backed by 24/7 personalized support 365 days a year. Check out Porkbun and save $1 off your domain name now.

The hype cycle finally caught up with AI. For the past 18 months, enterprises stampeded into generative AI pilots with billion-dollar budgets and glossy conference slides. Vendors promised transformation; consultants promised competitive advantage; executives promised shareholders an AI-driven future.

Now MIT Media Lab has dropped the bucket of cold water we all knew was coming: 95% of enterprise AI projects deliver zero measurable return.

The story writes itself. AI hype collapses. “Proof” that this was all smoke and mirrors. A neat bookend to the exuberance of the last two years.

But here’s the part the headlines skipped over: 5% of projects actually worked.

And those 5% aren’t flukes. They share a repeatable pattern—a playbook that startups, investors, and even slower-moving enterprises should be studying right now.

First, let’s acknowledge why 95% fail.

It’s not the models. MIT’s team looked at more than 300 projects and interviewed 150+ executives. Model quality and regulation weren’t the sticking points. Approach was.

Enterprises aren’t built for rapid pivots. They’re cruise ships. To change course, you need board approval, compliance sign-off, procurement negotiations, IT risk assessments, and five layers of management nodding along. By the time the ship moves, the wave has already broken.

That’s why internal AI projects only succeed about 33% of the time. External partnerships almost double that to 67%. Not because external vendors are smarter—it’s because they’ve seen this movie before. Internal teams know the business, but external teams know the patterns. Pair the two and you stand a chance. Leave them siloed, and the ship runs aground.

Executives love demos that dazzle. That’s why 50–70% of AI budgets went into sales and marketing pilots. It’s easy to imagine AI writing customer emails, qualifying leads, or building pitch decks at scale. It’s far harder to convince the board to invest in AI for procurement or finance operations.

But sales and marketing are precisely where AI is least effective right now. There’s no clear “ground truth.” No deterministic hierarchy of problems. The reasoning models are not there yet. And so enterprises burned capital chasing the one domain where AI is weakest, while ignoring the back-office workflows where automation could quietly print money.

In other words: the seduction of shiny projects created a graveyard of failed pilots.

And yet, not everyone failed. MIT’s data shows that 5% of enterprises are generating real, measurable ROI from AI. These are not unicorns. They’re simply disciplined.

What do they do differently?

The through-line? Focus beats hype.

Level Up With a Domain Name From Porkbun

Grow your latest venture with a domain name from Porkbun. Named the #1 domain registrar 3 years in a row by USA Today, they offer hundreds of domains like .com, .tech, .shop, and others at cost — without the markup other registrars have.

Plus every domain at Porkbun comes with free WHOIS privacy, SSL certificates, Cloudflare DNS, and more. All backed by 24/7 personalized support 365 days a year. Check out Porkbun and save $1 off your domain name now.

Here’s the unsexy truth that hype skipped: AI is only as good as the data beneath it.

Most pilots succeed in demo environments because they’re fed curated data. But the minute those models hit messy, real-world systems—full of duplicates, mis-labeled fields, siloed databases—they crater.

That’s why so many projects collapse right after the press release.

The 5% that succeed? They most likely started with data hygiene. Clean pipelines, structured feedback loops, governance frameworks, and integration from day one. They treat data as infrastructure, not exhaust.

Startups know this instinctively. They build from scratch with clean pipelines and structured workflows. Enterprises, meanwhile, try to bolt AI onto decades of messy, siloed data—and then act surprised when it doesn’t scale.

Garbage in, garbage out isn’t a cliché here. It’s the dividing line between ROI and wasted burn.

If the last 18 months were the “AI gold rush,” we’re now entering the shake-out. And that’s healthy. Disillusionment is a feature, not a bug. It separates gimmicks from durable platforms.

The enterprises and startups that come out ahead will share a few traits:

MIT’s report isn’t a reason to abandon AI. It’s a reason to take it seriously. The hype wave crested. The pilots failed. Now comes the hard part: building real businesses.

Enterprises will keep stumbling through nine-month cycles. Startups will ship in 30 days. Enterprises will chase shiny sales chatbots that backfire. Startups will quietly automate back-office workflows that drive margin expansion.

So stop obsessing over the 95% that failed. The real story is the 5% that won—and their playbook is already visible.

For enterprises, the path is clear but steep: clean your data, focus on real business problems, and integrate AI into workflows. For startups, the opportunity couldn’t be louder: the trough of disillusionment is not a trough at all. It’s the opening.