Roles: Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Teams in Startups

Ignite DTC x Shopline — Now Live

Pegasus is thrilled to announce our new partnership with Shopline, the leading AI-powered e-commerce platform built to help DTC founders scale smarter.

Together, we’re launching Ignite DTC, a 12-week accelerator explicitly designed for DTC brands ready to grow from initial traction to breakout revenue.

What Founders Get:

• Personalized storefronts and AI-native growth tools powered by Shopline

• Proven Pegasus playbooks built for speed, sales, and scale

• Direct access to investors, mentors, and distribution partners

• Potential $100K investment for top-performing teams

• A substantial grant (minimum $3,000) for migration and growth within the program

We’re blending real-world execution, data-driven strategy, and hands-on support to help DTC startups break through the noise and build something lasting.

Applications now open: Ignite DTC 

One of the most critical yet often overlooked decisions in launching a startup is choosing the right co-founding team. Founders frequently fall into the trap of building homogeneous teams, especially when starting with friends, former classmates, or colleagues. While this can provide comfort and validation in the early stages, it often leads to overlapping roles, unclear accountability, and long-term friction that can derail the venture.

The Pitfalls of Homogeneous Teams

The typical formation of a homogeneous team might look like this:

An idea strikes, and the founder quickly shares it with someone they know well—a friend, a classmate, or a former colleague. The other person shares the same enthusiasm for the idea, and their similar background makes the partnership feel seamless. Early on, this seems like a great decision. Both individuals dive into tasks with shared expertise, and progress feels rapid.

However, as the company evolves, challenges emerge. Conflicts arise over strategic decisions, and disagreements escalate due to overlapping skill sets and unclear boundaries. These conflicts create inefficiencies, erode trust, and, in many cases, lead to one founder leaving the venture. This not only jeopardizes the startup’s progress but also drains morale and resources.

The root of the issue lies in redundancy. When team members bring the same strengths to the table, they also share the same weaknesses. This limits the company’s ability to address a diverse range of challenges and makes disagreements harder to resolve.

The Case for Heterogeneous Teams

Building a heterogeneous team—one where members have distinct, complementary skill sets and roles—can address many of these challenges.

Key Benefits of Heterogeneous Teams

Clear Division of Labor

When team members have defined responsibilities, it reduces overlap, clarifies accountability, and ensures that tasks are handled efficiently. For instance, one founder might oversee product development while the other focuses on fundraising or marketing. This specialization allows each founder to focus on their strengths.

As Noam Wasserman notes in The Founder’s Dilemmas, “With a clear division of labor comes clear accountability: Everyone can see who is responsible for each success and each failure.”

Diverse Perspectives

Teams with varied skill sets bring a range of perspectives to the table, which enhances problem-solving and decision-making. This diversity can help avoid groupthink and uncover innovative solutions that might not emerge in a homogenous team.

Scalability

Startups need to scale quickly, and this requires a team capable of addressing different aspects of the business. Heterogeneous teams are better equipped to adapt to new challenges, as each member can tackle a specific area of expertise.

Conflict Resolution

While disagreements are inevitable in any startup, they tend to be more productive in heterogeneous teams because members are more likely to respect each other’s expertise. This can lead to constructive debates rather than counterproductive power struggles.

Discipline in Choosing the Right Co-Founder

Choosing a co-founder isn’t just about enthusiasm or convenience; it’s a strategic decision that can determine the success or failure of the venture. Founders must resist the temptation to partner with the most accessible person—such as a friend or colleague with a similar background—and instead seek someone whose skills complement their own.

Avoiding the Comfort Trap

If you’re a marketing specialist, avoid choosing another marketing expert as a co-founder. If you’re an engineer, find someone with sales experience. Complementary skill sets create balance and allow the team to address a wider range of challenges.

Division of Roles and Accountability

A clear division of roles not only helps streamline operations but also makes it easier to identify and address any issues that arise. For instance, if the company misses a product development deadline, it’s clear who is accountable, and the team can take corrective action without finger-pointing.

This clarity fosters a culture of accountability, which is essential for long-term growth.

Hierarchy vs. Egalitarian Structures

Another key decision for founding teams is whether to establish a hierarchical or egalitarian structure. Each approach has its merits, but the choice can significantly impact how decisions are made and how the company evolves.

The Egalitarian Approach

In an egalitarian structure, decision-making power is shared equally among co-founders.

Advantages:

Drawbacks:

The Hierarchical Approach

In a hierarchical structure, one founder (typically the CEO) has the final say on decisions.

Advantages:

Drawbacks:

Research by Eisenhardt et al. (1988) found that “CEO dominance is associated with a 19% decrease in firm performance.” However, a balanced hierarchical structure—where the CEO actively seeks input while retaining decision-making authority—can mitigate these risks.

The choice of structure often depends on the team’s dynamic, but the transition from an egalitarian approach to a hierarchical one is almost inevitable as the company grows. Establishing clear roles and responsibilities from the outset can help avoid conflicts later.

Is Your CEO the Right Fit?

The CEO plays a critical role in a startup, responsible for raising capital, selling the vision, and recruiting top talent. However, Wasserman’s research shows that the “idea person” takes on the CEO role in 47% of startups—even when they may lack the necessary skills.

Core Responsibilities of a CEO

If the CEO cannot perform these tasks, the team must have an honest conversation about redistributing responsibilities. Waiting to address these issues can lead to internal conflicts that hinder the company’s growth.

The Role of Titles in Scaling

C-level titles come with expectations. Founders who lack the skills or experience for their roles should be prepared to step aside or bring in external hires as the company scales. Research shows that many CEOs are replaced after Series B funding, with replacement rates increasing in subsequent rounds.

Rather than clinging to titles, founders should focus on what’s best for the company. Embracing a flexible approach to leadership can help ensure the venture’s long-term success.

Final Thoughts

Building the right team is about more than finding people who share your passion. It’s about assembling a group with complementary skills, clear roles, and a shared vision.

By prioritizing discipline in co-founder selection, fostering accountability through role definition, and embracing a leadership structure that supports scalability, founders can set their startups on a path to success.